I support removal of DID Document Resolution. -- Mike
________________________________ From: Filip Skokan <panva...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2025 10:48:23 AM To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Re: Call for WG Feedback on DID Resolution in SD-JWT VC I support the removal. S pozdravem, Filip Skokan On Fri, 12 Sept 2025 at 18:53, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com<mailto:rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: All, This is an official call for getting the WG’s opinion on the last open issue in draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-10 concerning the removal of the DID Document Resolution. In an early version of the SD-JWT VC document, we had three Issuer-signed JWT Verification Key Validation techniques: 1. JWT VC Issuer Metadata 2. X509 based certificates 3. DID Document Resolution Do you agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from the SD JWT VC specification? Please note that this does not prevent future extensions. Interested parties are free to define and publish an extension that adds DID Document Resolution support, if desired. Please, reply on the mailing list with your preference by October 3rd. Regards, Rifaat & Hannes _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org> To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
