I agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from the SD JWT VC specification. I look forward to reading a future extension that documents DID resolution.
Cheers, Andy Barlow On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 at 17:54, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > This is an official call for getting the WG’s opinion on the last open > issue in draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-10 concerning the *removal* of the *DID > Document Resolution*. > > In an early version of the SD-JWT VC document, we had three Issuer-signed > JWT Verification Key Validation techniques: > > 1. JWT VC Issuer Metadata > 2. X509 based certificates > 3. DID Document Resolution > > > Do you agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from > the SD JWT VC specification? > > Please note that this *does not *prevent future *extensions*. Interested > parties are free to define and publish an extension that adds DID Document > Resolution support, if desired. > > Please, reply on the *mailing list *with your preference by *October 3rd*. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
