I agree with the removal. I think DID document resolution would be better served as an extension if anyone wanted to pick up that work.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 9:54 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > This is an official call for getting the WG’s opinion on the last open issue > in draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-10 concerning the removal of the DID Document > Resolution. > > In an early version of the SD-JWT VC document, we had three Issuer-signed JWT > Verification Key Validation techniques: > > JWT VC Issuer Metadata > X509 based certificates > DID Document Resolution > > > Do you agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from the > SD JWT VC specification? > > Please note that this does not prevent future extensions. Interested parties > are free to define and publish an extension that adds DID Document Resolution > support, if desired. > > Please, reply on the mailing list with your preference by October 3rd. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
