I had to look up "concordance" For drafts being worked on, it is a concordance. For finalized documents, it is a glossary.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 2:26 PM Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 2:20 PM Dick Hardt <dick.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 1:37 PM Denis <denis.i...@free.fr> wrote: > >> > >> > >> The two following sentences seem to be contradictory: > >> > >> The glossary will contain: terms and definitions used in finalized > documents; and references to new terms and definitions being proposed in > draft documents. > >> > >> New definitions for existing terms, or new terms being used in draft > documents will not be published in the Glossary until the document has been > finalized. > > > > > > We need to improve this language, sorry for the confusion. > > > > Definitions that have not been finalized by being in a finalized > document will not be in the glossary. There will be a reference in the > glossary to the document that is drafting a new definition. > > > > This would enable someone looking at the glossary to know that a WG is > creating a new definition, and they would then share their input on what > that new definition is. > > Is this a glossary or a concordance? > > > > > -- > > ID-align mailing list -- id-al...@ietf.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to id-align-le...@ietf.org > > > > -- > Astra mortemque praestare gradatim >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
