On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 2:20 PM Dick Hardt <dick.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 1:37 PM Denis <denis.i...@free.fr> wrote: >> >> >> The two following sentences seem to be contradictory: >> >> The glossary will contain: terms and definitions used in finalized >> documents; and references to new terms and definitions being proposed in >> draft documents. >> >> New definitions for existing terms, or new terms being used in draft >> documents will not be published in the Glossary until the document has been >> finalized. > > > We need to improve this language, sorry for the confusion. > > Definitions that have not been finalized by being in a finalized document > will not be in the glossary. There will be a reference in the glossary to the > document that is drafting a new definition. > > This would enable someone looking at the glossary to know that a WG is > creating a new definition, and they would then share their input on what that > new definition is.
Is this a glossary or a concordance? > > -- > ID-align mailing list -- id-al...@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to id-align-le...@ietf.org -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
