Just reiterating my stance that this document detailing user authentication methods has no place in the OAuth working group.
— Justin > On Jan 19, 2016, at 6:48 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > this is the call for adoption of Authentication Method Reference Values, see > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-03 > > Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the > adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth > working group. > > Note: The feedback during the Yokohama meeting was inconclusive, namely > 9 for / zero against / 6 persons need more information. > > You feedback will therefore be important to find out whether we should > do this work in the OAuth working group. > > Ciao > Hannes & Derek > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
