I honestly don't understand the push to have additional registries under urn:ietf:params:oauth?
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: > This one's mostly there. As Mike and Hannes are discussing, the WG > needs to sort out exactly what goes under "oauth" here. > > Here's a suggestion: > Have Section 3 specify that what comes after "oauth" are one or more > tokens, delimited by ":". > Have Section 3 create the registry for the first-level token, "class". > In your example, that's "grant-type". > Have Section 3 specify that the definition of each "class" token > specifies what comes after it -- how many tokens, and the meaning(s). > Have Section 3 note that certain classes might create new > sub-registries for what goes under them, if necessary. > Have Section 3 note that certain classes might have *no* further > tokens under them. > > I realize that there might not be any use cases envisioned right now > for that last one, but it might be a bad idea to forbid it. > > Section 5: > > o Repository: [[not sure about this? this document or > http://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth]] > > Yeh, I've never been sure about that either. I think what you want > here is "[[The registry created in Section 3.]]". > See RFC 6134 for how I did this with the "sieve" namespace. > > Barry > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
