On 6/22/12 7:39 AM, Brian Campbell wrote: > Unless there are objections from the WG, I'd like to publish -04 today > with two smallish changes (new text listed below) to address the > question raised yesterday in > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09381.html and > have -04 be the draft for LC. > > First paragraph of §3: > "If a registrant wishes to have a OAuth URI registered, then a URN of > the form urn:ietf:params:oauth:<value> will be requested where > <value> is a suitable representation of the functionality or concept > being registered." > > Index value bullet of §5.1 > "Index value: values subordinate to urn:ietf:params:oauth are of > the from urn:ietf:params:oauth:<value> with <value> as the index > value. It is suggested that <value> include both a "class" and an > "identifier-within-class" component, with the two components being > separated by a colon (":"); other compositions of the <value> may > also be used.
WFM. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
