I understood his request and disagree that any action needs to be taken. It is unreasonable to expect every protocol to discuss the security considerations of a user installing malware.
EHL From: Melinda Shore <melinda.sh...@gmail.com<mailto:melinda.sh...@gmail.com>> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:18:18 -0700 To: "oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>" <oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] problem statement On 09/06/2011 11:11 AM, Jill Burrows wrote: I repeat, it is not an OAuth problem. If I'm reading Mike correctly (and if I'm not it won't be the first time I've misunderstood him), he's not really asking for OAUTH to solve this particular problem but to clarify the documents and beef up discussions of what is and is not in scope. He read the document and couldn't figure out whether or not this particular problem is the business of the working group. Melinda _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
