What about Security Considerations. I know some individuals have worked on it in the past - does it need a WG to complete
Mark McGloin Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> Sent by: oauth-boun...@ietf.org 12/09/2010 00:59 Hi all, at the Washington Internet Identity Workshop we had the chance to chat about OAuth. Given the progress on the main specification we should discuss WG re-chartering. The following items had been proposed at the meeting: * Messaging Signing Example: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg04250.html * User Experience Extensions Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux/ * Artifact Binding Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl/ * SAML for OAuth Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-saml/ * Recommendations of commonly used Scope values No draft available (to my knowledge) * Dynamic Client Registration Example: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt I am interested to hear a) what items are important for you; we cannot work on everything at the same time. b) what items are you willing to co-author (requires a hard time commitment) c) what items are you willing to review d) whether we should consider other items? Btw, to have your work considered you have to submit an IETF draft. Please use the Web tool to upload it: https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi Also use the following filename convention: draft-[author last name]-oauth-[some short name]-[version#].txt Ciao Hannes _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
