Hannes,
what about discovery?
"Recommendations of commonly used Scope values" sounds to weak from my
point of view. I would rather suggest to work towards a clear definition
of scope syntax and semantics, including resource server identification.
Please note, I submitted a I-D on token revocation
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation/) I
would like to become a WG item.
regards,
Torsten.
Am 12.09.2010 02:15, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig:
I forgot an item already, namely 'identity management using OAuth' in
the style of OpenID Connect.
At IIW we also had a chat about an implementers guide and
interoperability tests. The idea of the implementers guide is create a
living document that captures implementation experience with different
programming languages and development frameworks. It was also expected
that implementers will bundle different profiles and different
extensions in their implementation and it would be useful to describe
their experience.
In any case, I think both items are important.
Ciao
Hannes
On 11.09.2010 19:59, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Hi all,
at the Washington Internet Identity Workshop we had the chance to chat
about OAuth. Given the progress on the main specification we should
discuss WG re-chartering.
The following items had been proposed at the meeting:
* Messaging Signing
Example:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg04250.html
* User Experience Extensions
Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux/
* Artifact Binding
Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl/
* SAML for OAuth
Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-saml/
* Recommendations of commonly used Scope values
No draft available (to my knowledge)
* Dynamic Client Registration
Example: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt
I am interested to hear
a) what items are important for you; we cannot work on everything at the
same time.
b) what items are you willing to co-author (requires a hard time
commitment)
c) what items are you willing to review
d) whether we should consider other items?
Btw, to have your work considered you have to submit an IETF draft.
Please use the Web tool to upload it:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi
Also use the following filename convention:
draft-[author last name]-oauth-[some short name]-[version#].txt
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
