Thanks Thomas, With respect to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-saml/, I'm planning on updating it to come inline with draft -11 when it's published as well as a couple other updates related to subject conf and subject that have been discussed on this list. As it stands, I'm fine as author/editor of that and can always benefit from review. There may well be other SAML related work coming soon, however, that might be in need of author(s).
Thanks, Brian On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Thomas Hardjono <hardj...@mit.edu> wrote: > > Hannes, > > I strongly believe that SAML support in Outh2.0 and "SAML-interoperability" > is crucial in getting Oauth accepted and deployed in high-assurance > (high-value) environments (eg. government, financials). > > As such, if its ok with Brian, I would be willing to either co-author or > review the SAML-related drafts. > > > ps. Apologies for stating the obvious, but I think the new charter/recharter > should define clearly what is expected as deliverable(s) from the OAUTH WG in > regards to SAML support. > > Thanks. > > /thomas/ > > __________________________ > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf >> Of Hannes Tschofenig >> Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 8:00 PM >> To: oauth@ietf.org >> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering >> >> Hi all, >> >> at the Washington Internet Identity Workshop we had the chance to chat >> about OAuth. Given the progress on the main specification we should >> discuss WG re-chartering. >> >> The following items had been proposed at the meeting: >> >> * Messaging Signing >> Example: http://www.ietf.org/mail- >> archive/web/oauth/current/msg04250.html >> >> * User Experience Extensions >> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux/ >> >> * Artifact Binding >> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl/ >> >> * SAML for OAuth >> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-saml/ >> >> * Recommendations of commonly used Scope values No draft available (to >> my knowledge) >> >> * Dynamic Client Registration >> Example: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt >> >> I am interested to hear >> a) what items are important for you; we cannot work on everything at >> the same time. >> b) what items are you willing to co-author (requires a hard time >> commitment) >> c) what items are you willing to review >> d) whether we should consider other items? >> >> Btw, to have your work considered you have to submit an IETF draft. >> Please use the Web tool to upload it: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi >> Also use the following filename convention: >> draft-[author last name]-oauth-[some short name]-[version#].txt >> >> Ciao >> Hannes >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
