On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Allen Tom <a...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

>  One of the biggest differences between OAuth2 and WRAP is that OAuth2
> requires that Protected Resources be accessed using HTTPS if no signature is
> being used. Bullet Point #2 in Section 1.2 says:
>
>    4.  Don't allow bearer tokens without either SSL and/or signatures.
>        While some providers may offer this ability, they should be out
>        of spec for doing so though technically it won't break the flows.
>
> While I personally think that requiring SSL is a fantastic idea, and it’s
> very hard for me to argue against it, however....
>
> One of the goals for WRAP was to define a standard AuthZ interface for APIs
> which matched what we currently have on the Web. WRAP protected APIs are
> intended to be a replacement for screen scraping.
>
> On the web, almost all websites implement Cookie Auth. Specifically, when
> you log into a website, the browser is issued a bearer token, called a
> Cookie, and the browser is able to access Protected Resources by using the
> Cookie as the credential.
>
> The WRAP access token is intended to be a direct replacement for the HTTP
> Cookie. A client should be able to present its bearer token (a WRAP Access
> Token or an HTTP Cookie) without having to sign the request.
>
> While I certainly think that requiring SSL would be a huge improvement in
> internet security, HTTP does not require SSL, and since WRAP was intended to
> be a replacement for HTTP Cookie Auth, then OAuth2 should also not require
> HTTPS.
>
> Yes, dropping the SSL requirement isn’t optimal, but again the intent with
> WRAP was to replace HTTP Cookie auth, and it should be up to the service
> provider to require HTTPS when applicable.
>

I tend to agree that this is a SHOULD and not a MUST. There is a wide range
of types of protected resources, and many of these resources are already
available over HTTP connections. It probably should be a choice by the
authorization endpoint whether to allow non-HTTPS access.


> Allen
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to