Thank you for your expedient response, Deb. I updated the working version ofthe draft accordingly. I intend collecting updates from IESG review and upload the new version with them all.
Regards, Greg On Mon, Dec 30, 2024, 12:39 Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: > That would be lovely. [actually anything that doesn't introduce new terms > would also be fine.] > > Deb > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:21 PM Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Deb, >> thank you for your suggestion. Would s/ping test/ICMP echo request/reply >> test/ follow your idea? >> >> Regards, >> Greg >> >> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 4:34 AM Deb Cooley via Datatracker < >> nore...@ietf.org> wrote: >> >>> Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for >>> draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-13: No Objection >>> >>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>> >>> >>> Please refer to >>> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ >>> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>> >>> >>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam/ >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> COMMENT: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> The smallest nit: >>> Section 2.2, second to last para., last sentence: Through this draft >>> ICMP is >>> called an 'echo', except in this sentence where it is called a 'ping'. >>> Most >>> people realize that these are the same thing, but why not just use the >>> same >>> word to mean the same thing? I'd suggest changing 'ping' to 'echo' in >>> this >>> sentence. >>> >>> >>> >>>
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list -- nvo3@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to nvo3-le...@ietf.org
