That would be lovely. [actually anything that doesn't introduce new terms would also be fine.]
Deb On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:21 PM Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Deb, > thank you for your suggestion. Would s/ping test/ICMP echo request/reply > test/ follow your idea? > > Regards, > Greg > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 4:34 AM Deb Cooley via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > >> Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-13: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to >> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ >> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> The smallest nit: >> Section 2.2, second to last para., last sentence: Through this draft >> ICMP is >> called an 'echo', except in this sentence where it is called a 'ping'. >> Most >> people realize that these are the same thing, but why not just use the >> same >> word to mean the same thing? I'd suggest changing 'ping' to 'echo' in >> this >> sentence. >> >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list -- nvo3@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to nvo3-le...@ietf.org
