Hi Deb, thank you for your suggestion. Would s/ping test/ICMP echo request/reply test/ follow your idea?
Regards, Greg On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 4:34 AM Deb Cooley via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-13: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > The smallest nit: > Section 2.2, second to last para., last sentence: Through this draft ICMP > is > called an 'echo', except in this sentence where it is called a 'ping'. > Most > people realize that these are the same thing, but why not just use the same > word to mean the same thing? I'd suggest changing 'ping' to 'echo' in this > sentence. > > > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list -- nvo3@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to nvo3-le...@ietf.org
