+1
On 26 July 2016 04:57:34 EEST, Tom Herbert <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I believe that others are in a similar position but opposite with
>regards to
>> technical choices. The net result is that there are almost certain to
>be
>> multiple formats in the wild regardless of what is decided here. Yes,
>that
>> means letting the market decide rather than the IETF. I honestly
>don't
>> necessarily see that as a negative since it means that it will be
>based on
>> experience rather than theoretical arguments. I don't even think that
>it
>> will cause more confusion or set back the industry given that
>timescales of
>> ~5 years are being talked about for a new compromise encap if that
>were to
>> come to be.
>>
>I would like to meet the user who thinks having multiple interoperable
>solutions that do pretty make the same thing is a good idea.
>
>_______________________________________________
>nvo3 mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
