> I believe that others are in a similar position but opposite with regards to > technical choices. The net result is that there are almost certain to be > multiple formats in the wild regardless of what is decided here. Yes, that > means letting the market decide rather than the IETF. I honestly don't > necessarily see that as a negative since it means that it will be based on > experience rather than theoretical arguments. I don't even think that it > will cause more confusion or set back the industry given that timescales of > ~5 years are being talked about for a new compromise encap if that were to > come to be. > I would like to meet the user who thinks having multiple interoperable solutions that do pretty make the same thing is a good idea.
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
