Dear Chairs, Option 1 seems the most pragmatic and to yield the desired success.
Thanks Paul > On Jul 14, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > WG, > > The NVO3 working group has adopted three data plane encapsulations: > - VXLAN-GPE, > - Geneve, > - GUE (although the draft is moving to the Intarea WG, we anticipate > that NVO3 will still reference this). > > We have discussed this situation with Alia and we feel that there is little > benefit to the community in publishing all three as standards track RFCs. > > We would note that the discussion on the drafts has been relatively light > since their adoption. There has not been serious discussion about their > relative pros/cons (if any), or about the actual usefulness of their > extensibility or differentiators. > > This leaves two options: > > 1) Publish all of them as informational or experimental, potentially moving > one of them to standards track in the future based on > implementation/deployment. > 2) Pick one now based on technical and/or implementation/deployment criteria. > > We would therefore like to gain a sense of what the WG would like to do with > these drafts. > > Please post your comments to the list. We also have a slot to on the NVO3 > agenda in Berlin where we would like to continue this discussion. > > Best regards, > > > Matthew and Sam > > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
