> I believe GRE(+UDP) deserves a discussion as well.
FYI - over in TSVWG, this GRE/UDP draft is standards track and has completed WG
Last Call:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap/
Thanks, --David
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Manish Kumar
> (manishkr)
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 12:54 PM
> To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB); NVO3
> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Mail regarding NVO3 data plane drafts
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> I agree this is an important aspect that’s just lingering around. Although
> not being
> adopted and not a part of the WG, if there is a discussion on
> pros-cons/merits-
> demerits, I believe GRE(+UDP) deserves a discussion as well. For that matter,
> it
> may be worth having a broader discussion!
>
> Thanks,
> Manish
>
>
>
>
>
> On 14/07/16 9:51 pm, "nvo3 on behalf of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <nvo3-
> [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >WG,
> >
> >The NVO3 working group has adopted three data plane encapsulations:
> >- VXLAN-GPE,
> >- Geneve,
> >- GUE (although the draft is moving to the Intarea WG, we
> >anticipate that
> NVO3 will still reference this).
> >
> >We have discussed this situation with Alia and we feel that there is little
> >benefit
> to the community in publishing all three as standards track RFCs.
> >
> >We would note that the discussion on the drafts has been relatively light
> >since
> their adoption. There has not been serious discussion about their relative
> pros/cons (if any), or about the actual usefulness of their extensibility or
> differentiators.
> >
> >This leaves two options:
> >
> >1) Publish all of them as informational or experimental, potentially moving
> >one
> of them to standards track in the future based on implementation/deployment.
> >2) Pick one now based on technical and/or implementation/deployment criteria.
> >
> >We would therefore like to gain a sense of what the WG would like to do with
> these drafts.
> >
> >Please post your comments to the list. We also have a slot to on the NVO3
> agenda in Berlin where we would like to continue this discussion.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >
> >Matthew and Sam
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >nvo3 mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
