le falsità sono sempre esistite anche le credenze non riscontrabili imho il problema non è tanto il falso ma la sua diffusione e codice (aka scala, velocità e rimedio)
buona estate Il 7 agosto 2024 13:54:20 UTC, Fabio Alemagna <falem...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >Mi sembra la descrizione perfetta del comportamento di un politico medio. >Se dovessimo obbligare per legge gli LLM a dire la verità, per quale >ragione dovremmo esentare i politici dal fare altrettanto? > >Il mer 7 ago 2024, 12:55 J.C. DE MARTIN <juancarlos.demar...@polito.it> ha >scritto: > >> *OII | Large Language Models pose a risk to society and need tighter >> regulation, say Oxford researchers* >> >> Written by >> Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt and Chris Russell >> >> *Leading experts in regulation and ethics at the Oxford Internet >> Institute, part of the University of Oxford, have identified a new type of >> harm created by LLMs which they believe poses long-term risks to democratic >> societies and needs to be addressed* >> >> Large Language Models pose a risk to society and need tighter regulation, >> say Oxford researchers >> >> Leading experts in regulation and ethics at the Oxford Internet Institute, >> part of the University of Oxford, have identified a new type of harm >> created by LLMs which they believe poses long-term risks to democratic >> societies and needs to be addressed by creating a new legal duty for LLM >> providers. >> >> In their new paper ‘Do large language models have a legal duty to tell the >> truth?’, published by the Royal Society Open Science, the Oxford >> researchers set out how LLMs produce responses that are plausible, helpful >> and confident but contain factual inaccuracies, misleading references and >> biased information. They term this problematic phenomenon as ‘careless >> speech’ which they believe causes long-term harms to science, education and >> society. >> >> continua qui: >> https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/do-large-language-models-have-a-legal-duty-to-tell-the-truth/ >>
