Mi sembra la descrizione perfetta del comportamento di un politico medio. Se dovessimo obbligare per legge gli LLM a dire la verità, per quale ragione dovremmo esentare i politici dal fare altrettanto?
Il mer 7 ago 2024, 12:55 J.C. DE MARTIN <juancarlos.demar...@polito.it> ha scritto: > *OII | Large Language Models pose a risk to society and need tighter > regulation, say Oxford researchers* > > Written by > Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt and Chris Russell > > *Leading experts in regulation and ethics at the Oxford Internet > Institute, part of the University of Oxford, have identified a new type of > harm created by LLMs which they believe poses long-term risks to democratic > societies and needs to be addressed* > > Large Language Models pose a risk to society and need tighter regulation, > say Oxford researchers > > Leading experts in regulation and ethics at the Oxford Internet Institute, > part of the University of Oxford, have identified a new type of harm > created by LLMs which they believe poses long-term risks to democratic > societies and needs to be addressed by creating a new legal duty for LLM > providers. > > In their new paper ‘Do large language models have a legal duty to tell the > truth?’, published by the Royal Society Open Science, the Oxford > researchers set out how LLMs produce responses that are plausible, helpful > and confident but contain factual inaccuracies, misleading references and > biased information. They term this problematic phenomenon as ‘careless > speech’ which they believe causes long-term harms to science, education and > society. > > continua qui: > https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/do-large-language-models-have-a-legal-duty-to-tell-the-truth/ >
