certo: magari puoi usare il modello large via API su Azure mentre il medium
lo installi sul server da 20K giù in cantina
con un po' di impegno da parte del tuo IT (prompting, fine-tuning,
few-shot, etc) fai i confronti e magari alla fine scopri che del large
model puoi fare benissimo a meno e semplicemente non lo usi più
per questo, più che stracciarsi le vesti servirebbe capire concretamente
quali strategie convengono e quali competenze servono
G.

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 09:17, Alessandro Brolpito <abrolp...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Buongiorno Guido,
>
> Una domanda da inesperto: ma se ormai molti enti privati e pubblici sono
> nei loro clouds, ad esempio Azure, è tecnicamente possibile  per enti
> pubblici e/o aziende usare dei modelli aperti di AI generativa in modo
> autonomo, saltando quello built-in?
>
> Cordiali saluti, Alessandro
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 08:58, Guido Vetere <vetere.gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Che Mistral abbia venduto una quota a Microsoft io però non l'ho letto da
>> nessuna parte. Da quello che si capisce, Mistral Large sarà disponibile su
>> Azure, forse perché le alternative non erano molte e non erano meglio. Che
>> questo modello GPT-4-like non sia 'open' mi pare altrettanto ineluttabile:
>> chi potrebbe scaricarselo? E dove? E perché?
>>
>> La cosa importante è che vi siano modelli aperti di dimensioni trattabili
>> che siano abbastanza buoni da consentire ad aziende e enti pubblici di
>> usare l'AI generativa in modo efficace e autonomo sulle proprie
>> infrastrutture, senza cadere sotto il dominio del monopolista di turno.
>> Questa è la frontiera che l'EU dovrebbe difendere.
>>
>> G.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 23:03, Daniela Tafani <daniela.taf...@unipi.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Microsoft and Mistral AI announce new partnership to accelerate AI
>>> innovation and introduce Mistral Large first on Azure
>>> By Eric Boyd, Corporate Vice President, Azure AI Platform, Microsoft
>>>
>>> https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-and-mistral-ai-announce-new-partnership-to-accelerate-ai-innovation-and-introduce-mistral-large-first-on-azure/
>>> -----
>>> Il commento di Luca Bertuzzi:
>>> This is a mind-blowing announcement. Mistral AI, the French company that
>>> has been fighting tooth and nail to water down the #AIAct's foundation
>>> model rules, is partnering up with Microsoft. So much for 'give us a
>>> fighting chance against Big Tech'.
>>> The first question that comes to mind is: was this deal in the making
>>> while the AI Act was being negotiated? That would mean Mistral discussed
>>> selling a minority stake to Microsoft while playing the 'European champion'
>>> card with the EU and French institutions. If so, this whole thing might be
>>> a masterclass in astroturfing, and it seems unrealistic for a partnership
>>> like this to be finalised in less than a month.  Many people involved in
>>> the AI Act noted how Big Tech's lobbying on GPAI suddenly went quiet toward
>>> the end.
>>> That is because they did not need to intervene since Mistral was doing
>>> the 'dirty work' for them. Remarkably, Mistral's talking points were
>>> extremely similar to those of Big Tech rather than those of a small AI
>>> start-up, based on their ambition to reach that scale.
>>> The other question is how much the French government knew about this
>>> upcoming partnership with Microsoft. It seems unlikely Paris was kept
>>> completely in the dark, but cosying up with Big Tech does not really sit
>>> well with France's strive for 'strategic autonomy'. Especially since the
>>> agreement includes making Mistral's large language model available on
>>> Microsoft's Azure AI platform, while France has been pushing for an EU
>>> cybersecurity scheme to exclude American hyperscalers from the European
>>> market.
>>> Still today, and I doubt it is a coincidence, Mistral has announced the
>>> launch of Large, a new language model intended to compete directly with
>>> OpenAI's GPT-4. However, unlike previous models, Large will not be open
>>> source. In other words, Mistral is no longer (just) a European leader and
>>> is backtracking on its much-celebrated open source approach. Where does
>>> this leave the start-up vis-à-vis EU policymakers as the AI Act's
>>> enforcement approaches? My guess is that someone will inevitably feel
>>> played.
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/BertuzLuca/status/1762197130616209765
>>> oppure
>>>
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/luca-bertuzzi-186729130_introducing-mistral-large-on-azure-in-partnership-activity-7167962807827611649-fG3e
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nexa mailing list
>>> nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
>>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nexa mailing list
>> nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
>>
>
_______________________________________________
nexa mailing list
nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Reply via email to