Aspetto che trovo insopportabile di questa lettera: il claim (falso) "Contemporary AI systems are now becoming human-competitive at general tasks" è supportato bibliograficamente da ricerca svolta da investitori in OpenAI (e non peer reviewed).
Quindi la lettera che si auto promuove come "contro", contribuisce in realtà ad alimentare lo hype dei prodotti che vorrebbe rallentare. Come astroturfing abbiamo visto di meglio... On March 29, 2023 8:47:53 AM GMT+02:00, "J.C. DE MARTIN" <juancarlos.demar...@polito.it> wrote: >Primi firmatari: Yoshua Bengio, Stuart Russell, Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak. > >jc* > >Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter** >* >/We call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the >training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. >/ > >https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ > >// > >AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to >society and humanity, as shown by extensive research^[1] and acknowledged by >top AI labs.^[2] As stated in the widely-endorsed Asilomar AI Principles ><https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/ai-principles/>, /Advanced AI could >represent a profound change in the history of life on Earth, and should be >planned for and managed with commensurate care and resources/. Unfortunately, >this level of planning and management is not happening, even though recent >months have seen AI labs locked in an out-of-control race to develop and >deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one – not even their creators >– can understand, predict, or reliably control. > >Contemporary AI systems are now becoming human-competitive at general >tasks,^[3] and we must ask ourselves: /Should/ we let machines flood our >information channels with propaganda and untruth? /Should/ we automate away >all the jobs, including the fulfilling ones? /Should/ we develop nonhuman >minds that might eventually outnumber, outsmart, obsolete and replace us? >/Should/ we risk loss of control of our civilization? Such decisions must not >be delegated to unelected tech leaders. *Powerful AI systems should be >developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and >their risks will be manageable.* This confidence must be well justified and >increase with the magnitude of a system's potential effects. OpenAI's recent >statement regarding artificial general intelligence ><https://openai.com/blog/planning-for-agi-and-beyond>, states that /"At some >point, it may be important to get independent review before starting to train >future systems, and for the most advanced efforts to agree to limit the rate >of growth of compute used for creating new models."/ We agree. That point is >now. > >Therefore, *we call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months >the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4*. This pause should be >public and verifiable, and include all key actors. If such a pause cannot be >enacted quickly, governments should step in and institute a moratorium. > >AI labs and independent experts should use this pause to jointly develop and >implement a set of shared safety protocols for advanced AI design and >development that are rigorously audited and overseen by independent outside >experts. These protocols should ensure that systems adhering to them are safe >beyond a reasonable doubt.^[4] This does /not/ mean a pause on AI development >in general, merely a stepping back from the dangerous race to ever-larger >unpredictable black-box models with emergent capabilities. > >AI research and development should be refocused on making today's powerful, >state-of-the-art systems more accurate, safe, interpretable, transparent, >robust, aligned, trustworthy, and loyal. > >In parallel, AI developers must work with policymakers to dramatically >accelerate development of robust AI governance systems. These should at a >minimum include: new and capable regulatory authorities dedicated to AI; >oversight and tracking of highly capable AI systems and large pools of >computational capability; provenance and watermarking systems to help >distinguish real from synthetic and to track model leaks; a robust auditing >and certification ecosystem; liability for AI-caused harm; robust public >funding for technical AI safety research; and well-resourced institutions for >coping with the dramatic economic and political disruptions (especially to >democracy) that AI will cause. > >Humanity can enjoy a flourishing future with AI. Having succeeded in creating >powerful AI systems, we can now enjoy an "AI summer" in which we reap the >rewards, engineer these systems for the clear benefit of all, and give society >a chance to adapt. Society has hit pause on other technologies with >potentially catastrophic effects on society.^[5] We can do so here. Let's >enjoy a long AI summer, not rush unprepared into a fall. > -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity and top-posting. _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
