Yes we did play around with Quantum some time back. But it needs more work. Our goal is to de-centralize nova network using Openvswitch, Controller for openvswitch & flowvisor. For Quantum, we would expect it to hold network information like network nodes, existing network slices and other relavent networking information. Another good feature would be to update quantum with existing flows and its information. Having this information in Quantum, it would be easy to handle dynamic changes in network slices and its monitoring ( at slice and node level) from Openstack Dashboard (maybe) or using quantum api.
Akshaykumar To: "Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat)" <snaiksat@xxxxxxxxx> From: Deepak Garg <deepakgarg.iitg@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:08:38 +0530 Cc: netstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In-reply-to: <cb5eda8fb6fb99469d660137d6efbec90b913...@xmb-sjc-22e.amer.cisco.com> I thought as of now its the business demand that drives the priority for the blueprints and features. I guess the problem is companies ( like HP and Internap ) have not played a lot around quantum yet. So, we haven't got their feedbacks/comments/needs. If there are some HP and Internap folks here, please correct me if this is wrong. Deepak -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp