On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00:34PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Yoshihiro-san, there was no need to hurry -- net-next is still closed and > by posting this patch to netdev you're only making DaveM upset...
True. > On 01/26/2016 03:23 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > >> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi...@renesas.com> > >> > >>This patch supports the following interrupts. > >> > >>- One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management) > >>- One interrupt for emac > >>- Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control rx/tx) > >> > >>This patch improve efficiency of the interrupt handler by adding the > >>interrupt handler corresponding to each interrupt source described > >>above. Additionally, it reduces the number of times of the access to > >>EthernetAVB IF. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi...@renesas.com> > >>Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0...@gmail.com> > > > >I have tested this patch and the result seems positive. > > Tested on gen3 only I guess? Yes, that is correct. > >Please let me know if any more/different testing would help. > > Sanity testing on some gen2 SoC wouldn't hurt (if you have time). I don't believe that I have access to a gen2 board (+ extra hardware ?) where ravb works. If you do would it be possible for you to do a sanity test?
