On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 09:06 -0500, jamal wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-11 at 14:52 +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > ... > > If we manage to convince Jamal, IMHO a patch to something current like > > 2.6.24-rc1-git14 (or maybe -rc2 soon), should suffice (plus some > > options to diff to get function names etc. eg.: diff -Nurp). Try with > > Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Git isn't necessary at all. And don't > > forget about a changelog. > > That code hasnt changed at all in a few years, so even against > 2.6.24-rc1 should be fine and can be applied cleanly to Daves net-2.6. > Radu, please refer to my earlier email on things to try.
Ok, silly procmail rules + threaded view = bad idea. I just didn't see your last messages earlier when I replied. Sorry! But still, Jamal, I need more explanations on what you meant by "cutdown on the conversion in u32_change()". And, before proceeding, I'd like to see your reply to Jarek's last email (at 15:49 +0100) about not getting 0xff in the end. Jarek, because I have to test anyway, I'll include ffs(mask) in my patch and have it tested too. I already have a clone of Dave's net-2.6 tree, so it shouldn't be such a big effort to use git after all. I can also make the patch against 2.6.24-rc1, so please tell me which is more convinient for you. Cheers, Radu Rendec - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
