On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 08:43:32AM -0500, jamal wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-11 at 14:59 +0200, Radu Rendec wrote: > > Jarek, thanks for replying my message on the list and pointing it to the > > right direction. > > > > Your example with "1" bits laying on exact nibble boundary is much > > easier to analyze than my original example. And your computation seems > > to be right: u32_hash_fold() would return 00.f0.00.0f (and would be cut > > off to 0f after applying the divisor mask). > > Yes, that example i believe would work just fine today as is with no > changes. ... > Please try the patch i sent since it is simpler. It is your work more or > less - so you should get the credit as author.
Jamal + Houston, we have a problem... ...Or talk about different things or patches... IMHO, both 'today as is' and your 1-st proposal get this example wrong: we need 00.00.00.ff at the end, don't we? Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
