On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 10:47 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 4:12 PM
> > To: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org; Bodong Wang
> > <bod...@mellanox.com>; Parav Pandit <pa...@mellanox.com>; Mark
> > Bloch
> > <ma...@mellanox.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 14/15] {IB, net}/mlx5: E-Switch, Use
> > index of rep
> > for vport to IB port mapping
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 07:23:37PM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > From: Bodong Wang <bod...@mellanox.com>
> > >
> > > In the single IB device mode, the mapping between vport number
> > > and rep
> > > relies on a counter. However for dynamic vport allocation, it is
> > > desired to keep consistent map of eswitch vport and IB port.
> > >
> > > Hence, simplify code to remove the free running counter and
> > > instead
> > > use the available vport index during load/unload sequence from
> > > the
> > > eswitch.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bod...@mellanox.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Parav Pandit <pa...@mellanox.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <pa...@mellanox.com>
> >
> > We are not adding multiple "*-by" for same user, please choose one.
> >
> Suggested-by was added by Bodong during our discussion. Later on when
> I did gerrit +1, RB tag got added.
>
Is there a rule against having multiple "*-by" ? i don't think so and
there shouldn't be, users need to get the exact amount of recognition
as the amount of work they put into this patch, if they reviewed and
tested a patch they deserve two tags ..
