From: Bodong Wang <bod...@mellanox.com>

Driver is referring to the array index when doing rep initialization,
using vport is confusing as it's normally interpreted as vport number.

This patch doesn't change any functionality.

Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bod...@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <pa...@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <ma...@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index 5124219a31de..f29b9e1f49ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ int esw_offloads_init_reps(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
        struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = esw->dev;
        struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep;
        u8 hw_id[ETH_ALEN], rep_type;
-       int vport;
+       int vport_index;
 
        esw->offloads.vport_reps = kcalloc(total_vports,
                                           sizeof(struct mlx5_eswitch_rep),
@@ -1409,8 +1409,8 @@ int esw_offloads_init_reps(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
 
        mlx5_query_nic_vport_mac_address(dev, 0, hw_id);
 
-       mlx5_esw_for_all_reps(esw, vport, rep) {
-               rep->vport = mlx5_eswitch_index_to_vport_num(esw, vport);
+       mlx5_esw_for_all_reps(esw, vport_index, rep) {
+               rep->vport = mlx5_eswitch_index_to_vport_num(esw, vport_index);
                ether_addr_copy(rep->hw_id, hw_id);
 
                for (rep_type = 0; rep_type < NUM_REP_TYPES; rep_type++)
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to