Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:42:49PM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:30:26 +0900 (KST), David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com>
>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:36:11 -0800
>> 
>> > The dummy driver have previously been extended to test SR-IOV,
>> > but the general consensus seems to be against adding further
>> > features to it.  
>> 
>> I guess this is fine, but then is it going to be the case that
>> every time we want to add a software offload implementation for
>> testing driver paths we add yet another dummy driver?
>
>I would expect others to extend the netdevsim driver, so all test/SW
>implementation would live there.
>
>I was considering moving the SR-IOV code over, too, but I'm worried  

Agreed. Leave dummy be dummy. netdevsim should serve this purpose.

Thanks!

>I will break existing tests.  Phil, Sabrina would you be OK with that?

Reply via email to