Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:49:17AM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote: >On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:36:11AM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote: >>>To be able to run selftests without any hardware required we >>>need a software model. The model can also serve as an example >>>implementation for those implementing actual HW offloads. >>>The dummy driver have previously been extended to test SR-IOV, >>>but the general consensus seems to be against adding further >>>features to it. >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com> >>>Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com> >>>--- >> >> [...] >> >> >>>+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c >>>@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ >>>+/* >>>+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Netronome Systems, Inc. >>>+ * >>>+ * This software is dual licensed under the GNU General License Version 2, >>>+ * June 1991 as shown in the file COPYING in the top-level directory of this >>>+ * source tree or the BSD 2-Clause License provided below. You have the >>>+ * option to license this software under the complete terms of either >>>license. >>>+ * >>>+ * The BSD 2-Clause License: >> >> Why gpl2 is not enough for this? > >It's the license I got from legal, I will request permission to use >pure gpl2. Thanks!
Yeah, I semi-understand need for bsd for actual hw driver (we have it for mlxsw as well). But for this testing driver, it really does not make sense.
