From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:23:01 +0200
> The problem is to find out what a good boundary is. The more I think about this the more I lean towards two conclusions: 1) dynamic table growth is the only reasonable way to handle this and not waste memory in all cases 2) for cases where we haven't implemented dynamic table growth, specifying a proper limit argument to the hash table allocation is a sufficient solution for the time being - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
