From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:11:29 -0700 (PDT)

> But there's alot of state to update (more or less
> atomically, too) in the TCP hashes. Looks tricky to
> do that without hurting performance, especially since
> you'll probably want to resize the tables when you've
> discovered they're full and busy....

There have been two failed attempts at this :)

For the time being I think the routing cache can be
dynamically sized with less effort, and I might take
a stab at that today.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to