From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 02:24:04 +0200
> Yes, but even with dynamic growth you still need some upper boundary > (otherwise a DOS could eat all your memory). And it would need > to be figured out what it is. Absolutely. Otherwise the GC'ing of the routing cache would break horribly. > BTW does dynamic shrink after a load spike make sense too? I'm not sure about that bit yet. > Or do some cheesy default and document the options to change > it clearly and wait for feedback from users on what works for > them? I think this makes sense. An initial upper limit of 1 million hash table slots seems reasonable at first. That's 8MB on a 64-bit machine. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
