There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
arch_spin_unlock_wait().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidef...@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-s...@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.and...@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h
index f7838ecd83c6..217ee5210c32 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -98,13 +98,6 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lp)
: "cc", "memory");
}
-static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- while (arch_spin_is_locked(lock))
- arch_spin_relax(lock);
- smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
-}
-
/*
* Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers
* but only one writer.
--
2.5.2
