There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
arch_spin_unlock_wait().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <ch...@zankel.net>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-xte...@linux-xtensa.org>
---
arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h
b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h
index a36221cf6363..3bb49681ee24 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -33,11 +33,6 @@
#define arch_spin_is_locked(x) ((x)->slock != 0)
-static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->slock, !VAL);
-}
-
#define arch_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_spin_lock(lock)
static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
--
2.5.2
