On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:01:20PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics, > and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock > pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific > arch_spin_unlock_wait(). > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> > Cc: <linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > Cc: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> > Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.and...@gmail.com> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 58 > ++++----------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
I'm going to miss this code. Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> Will
