On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:10:09 -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote: > I wanted to do same, that is free dst and skb in caller function. But > that would need more changes due to discrepancy in IPv4 udp-tunnel and > IPv6 udp-tunnel api. IPv4 works on route entry and IPv6 needs dst > entry. so If caller frees dst-entry then I need additional variable to > keep track of dst entry which is what I am trying to avoid.
Is additional variable really that bad? It's likely to be optimized by the compiler and it will lead to less surprises. You obviously caught me during review :-) Jiri
