jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Sure. But the changes are said to "fix" it, without success (of course, >> they can't succeed without doing what I outlined, that's just >> theoretically impossible, and OTOH not needed at all). > > And i fail to see how.
I think I can only agree with you on that. > Factor that with these netlink messages could infact be lost Being lost is one thing, delays are unavoidable. > and then > tell me how this is any different from what you seem to be insisting > is a race. You must be thinking about someone else. > [your rant about your super-patch ignored from now on] Better late than never. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html