On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 20:45 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Lets start with the basics: With this patch, can you still do what you > > used to do before the change that broke things for you? > > I have put workarounds in place and my drivers are currently working, > without any additional patch. So unless something is broken again > they of course will continue to work. >
I ask you a very specific question, you start playing silly games with words. This is why it has been hard to make progress with you. I didnt ask what you are doing without the patch or whether you will use the patch at all, rather whether it will restore the functionality that was broken. Let me repeat the question again: Is Stefan's patch going to restore the functionality that you need? Look at his code and doc that he provided on how drivers would work. If not point out why. > Does your question means it's ok for you to put nonfunctional things > in the kernel, just because they don't apparently break anything? Lets not deviate the discussion. A question is not answered with a question. You could answer with "yes, it is good enough" and then go to "but i have these other issues with it". Two separate issues. Answer the question then we can move to the "but .." part cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
