> Can I please get a review of this change which fixes the issue noted in 
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8335181?
> 
> As noted in that issue, the current implementation in the 
> `java.net.http.HttpClient` doesn't correctly handle an incoming GOAWAY frame. 
> The HTTP3 RFC https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113#name-goaway notes the 
> specifics on what the expectations are when an endpoint receives a GOAWAY 
> frame from the peer.
> 
> Before the changes proposed in this PR, the HttpClient implementation would 
> (incorrectly) shutdown the connection and abort requests when a GOAWAY frame 
> was received. The changes in this PR fixes that by retrying relevant 
> unprocessed requests (if any) and not initiating any new streams on the 
> connection.
> 
> A new test has been introduced to exercise this detail. The test continues to 
> pass along with other existing tests. tier testing as well as a repeated 
> testing (with test-repeat 50) is currently in progress with this change.

Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  simplify test, handle REFUSED_STREAM on the client side, fix WindowController 
assertion

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20442/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20442/files/54ce899b..b4641f60

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=20442&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=20442&range=01-02

  Stats: 222 lines in 10 files changed: 96 ins; 54 del; 72 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20442.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20442/head:pull/20442

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20442

Reply via email to