> Hi,
> 
> Could someone please review my changes for the removal of the legacy 
> `PlainSocketImpl` and `PlainDatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
> 
> In JDK 13, JEP 353 provided a drop in replacement for the legacy 
> `PlainSocketImpl` implementation. Since JDK 13, the `PlainSocketImpl` 
> implementation was no longer used but included a mitigation mechanism to 
> reduce compatibility risks in the form of a JDK-specific property 
> `jdk.net.usePlainSocketImpl` allowing to switch back to the old 
> implementation. 
> Similarly, in JDK 15, JEP 373 provided a new implementation for 
> `DatagramSocket` and `MulticastSocket`, with a JDK-specific property 
> `jdk.net.usePlainDatagramSocketImpl` also allowing the user to switch back to 
> the old implementation in case of compatibility issue.
> 
> As these implementations (and the mechanisms they use to enable them to 
> mitigate compatibility issues) have been deemed no longer necessary, they now 
> represent a maintenance burden. This patch looks at removing them from the 
> JDK.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Patrick

Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8253119
 - 8253119: Remove the legacy PlainSocketImpl and PlainDatagramSocketImpl 
implementation

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4574/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4574/files/1aa471c0..4f04b850

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=4574&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=4574&range=00-01

  Stats: 2308 lines in 25 files changed: 640 ins; 1527 del; 141 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4574.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4574/head:pull/4574

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4574

Reply via email to