Daniel, Alan, I excluded the update from the draft to the RFC and created a separate bug for it:
[P5] 8213757: Investigate the possibility of updating the reference to the spec in java.net.Inet6Address I added the changes to the URI class from JDK-8213490, which then effectively became a duplicate. Please have a look at the result here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8213490/webrev.01/ -Pavel > On 12 Nov 2018, at 18:14, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 12/11/2018 17:30, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >> The typos fixes look OK to me - I'll let Michael/Chris? >> who have more knowledge on the history of the Inet6Address >> impl to validate the new link - though I suspect that's OK. >> > It will need a CSR because it changes Inet6Address to specify that it can be > extended with scoped addresses described by RFC 4007. It might need analysis > to understand the differences between the draft and RFC 4007 (just in case it > brings up implementation or conformance test issues). > > -Alan
