> On 12 Nov 2018, at 18:14, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > > It will need a CSR because it changes Inet6Address to specify that it can be > extended with scoped addresses described by RFC 4007. It might need analysis > to understand the differences between the draft and RFC 4007 (just in case it > brings up implementation or conformance test issues).
Good point Alan. I will exclude this change from this RFR and create a separate P5 bug. Everything else is just typos. No need to complicate things with this particular change.
