On 12/11/2018 17:30, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Pavel,
The typos fixes look OK to me - I'll let Michael/Chris?
who have more knowledge on the history of the Inet6Address
impl to validate the new link - though I suspect that's OK.
It will need a CSR because it changes Inet6Address to specify that it
can be extended with scoped addresses described by RFC 4007. It might
need analysis to understand the differences between the draft and RFC
4007 (just in case it brings up implementation or conformance test issues).
-Alan
