On 4 Nov 2014, at 11:15, Michael McMahon <michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 04/11/14 11:10, Alan Bateman wrote: >> On 04/11/2014 11:00, Michael McMahon wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Alan. How about I just split the test and check the option setting >>> behavior in OptionsTest.java >>> which doesn't have any reference to the jdk.net.Sockets APIs and then check >>> the Sockets.supportedOptions() >>> method in the new test? >> That sounds okay too, I assume it's possible to come up with a good name for >> the new test too. >> >> -Alan > > SupportedOptions.java maybe. That would be fine, or SupportedOptionsTest.java, or StandardSocketOptionsTest.java -Chris. > Michael
