On 04/11/14 11:10, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 04/11/2014 11:00, Michael McMahon wrote:That sounds okay too, I assume it's possible to come up with a good name for the new test too.Thanks Alan. How about I just split the test and check the option setting behavior in OptionsTest.java which doesn't have any reference to the jdk.net.Sockets APIs and then check the Sockets.supportedOptions()method in the new test?-Alan
SupportedOptions.java maybe. Michael