On 25/Jun/18 15:57, Ben Cannon wrote: > I’ll cop to ubiquiti at home and at work too (mainly for Wi-Fi and some ptp > backhaul in which they are very strong). Any kind of HA in their routers > keeps them out my enterprise clients of mine, let alone my network core. With pressure on pricing in some of our markets in Africa, we are seeing Enterprise customers asking for el-cheapo router options, and MikroTik has been right up there with plenty for sub-1Gbps deliveries. I'm thinking the Ubiquiti ERX could be a viable option, as it pays to have more than one from the pot. Mark.
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Jared Mauch
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Ben Cannon
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mike Hammett
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mike Hammett
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? ... Matt Harris
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need ... Lee Howard
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: ... lobna gouda
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was ... Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? ... valdis . kletnieks
- Re: IPv6 faster/better pro... lobna gouda