On 23/Jun/18 20:14, Randy Bush wrote: > in small corners, e.g. home, i use ubiquiti erx. i use the cli for > config, and the gooey for watching traffic levels in pretty colors. > they play well with both concast and at&t u-verse ipv4 and ipv6. That was a good tip, as I hadn't seen these before this thread. One thing I like about the MikroTik is that it goes forever without needing a reboot. My previous Claix GPON ONU + IP Router combo box needed a reboot a couple of times a year as it was running out of memory to hold NAT44 state. Same thing as my previous Netgear and Linksys routers. The MikroTik; well, had for almost 2 years and only reboot it to do software updates. Mark.
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mike Hammett
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Jared Mauch
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Ben Cannon
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mike Hammett
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mike Hammett
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? ... Matt Harris
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need ... Lee Howard
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: ... lobna gouda
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was ... Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG